After Mint’s shutdown, developers need a finance app that respects data ownership and privacy. Compare Budgie, Actual Budget, Firefly III, and more.
After 17 years of helping millions track their spending, Mint officially shut down on March 23, 2024. If you’re a developer who relied on Mint, you’re probably feeling frustrated, betrayed, and maybe a bit anxious about where your financial data will live next.
You’re not alone. The shutdown affected over 3.6 million active users, and the transition path Intuit offered (Credit Karma) left most of us deeply unsatisfied. For developers especially, Credit Karma’s approach to data privacy and lack of technical features makes it a non-starter.
This guide is written by developers, for developers. We’ve tested every major Mint alternative and evaluated them based on what actually matters to technical users: data ownership, API access, export capabilities, privacy practices, and the ability to self-host or run offline.
Let’s find your new financial home.
Mint launched in 2007 and quickly became the gold standard for personal finance apps. Intuit acquired it in 2009 for $170 million, and for years, it seemed like a perfect marriage. Mint aggregated your accounts, categorized transactions automatically, and gave you a clean dashboard view of your financial life.
Then things started to deteriorate.
The shutdown wasn’t just about a product failing. It was a wake-up call about the risks of trusting your financial data to a free, ad-supported service owned by a corporation whose priorities can shift overnight.
Intuit’s official recommendation was to migrate to Credit Karma. On the surface, it makes sense: same parent company, established platform, free to use. But for developers and privacy-conscious users, Credit Karma has fundamental problems.
Credit Karma’s business model is built entirely on monetizing your financial data. They offer free credit monitoring in exchange for showing you targeted financial product recommendations. Every credit card, loan, and insurance offer you see is there because Credit Karma’s algorithms determined you’re a good target based on your financial profile.
This isn’t hidden. Credit Karma is upfront that they make money when you accept offers. But the implications are significant:
Beyond privacy concerns, Credit Karma simply lacks features that technical users expect:
Perhaps most importantly, Credit Karma is owned by the same company that just shut down Mint. If Intuit decided Mint wasn’t worth maintaining after 17 years, what guarantees do you have about Credit Karma’s longevity?
For developers who value data ownership and system reliability, this is an unacceptable risk.
Before diving into alternatives, let’s establish what technical users typically prioritize. Based on discussions in developer communities like Hacker News, Reddit’s r/selfhosted, and various Discord servers, here’s what matters most:
Your financial data belongs to you. Period. A good budget app should:
Developers want to integrate their financial data with other tools:
This means more than just a privacy policy. True privacy requires:
The app needs to work:
Developers hate arbitrary limitations:
With these criteria in mind, let’s evaluate the alternatives.
We’ve tested each of these apps extensively. Here’s how they stack up for technical users:
Let’s dive deeper into each option.
Best for: Developers who prioritize privacy and want a modern, offline-first experience.
Budgie takes a fundamentally different approach to personal finance apps. Instead of storing your data in the cloud, everything lives on your device. No servers to hack. No company with access to your transactions. No risk of another Mint-style shutdown taking your data with it.
What Sets Budgie Apart:
Developer-Friendly Features:
Trade-offs to Consider:
Pricing: Free. No ads, no premium tiers, no data monetization.
Best for: Developers comfortable with Docker who want complete infrastructure control.
Actual Budget started as a commercial app, then became open source in 2022. It’s now maintained by an active community and has become the go-to choice for self-hosting enthusiasts.
Strengths:
Developer-Friendly Features:
Trade-offs to Consider:
Pricing: Free to self-host. Paid hosting option available from the community.
Best for: Power users who want granular control over every aspect of financial tracking.
Firefly III is the Linux of personal finance apps: incredibly powerful, deeply customizable, and requires some investment to set up properly. For developers who want complete control, it’s hard to beat.
Strengths:
Developer-Friendly Features:
Trade-offs to Consider:
Pricing: Free and open source.
Best for: Developers who want API access without self-hosting infrastructure.
Lunch Money was built by a solo developer and maintains a developer-friendly ethos. It’s the best cloud-based option for those who want programmatic access to their data.
Strengths:
Developer-Friendly Features:
Trade-offs to Consider:
Pricing: $10/month after 14-day free trial.
Best for: iOS/Mac users who prioritize design and are comfortable in Apple’s walled garden.
Copilot is a beautifully designed app exclusive to Apple platforms. If you’re deeply embedded in the Apple ecosystem and aesthetics matter to you, it’s worth considering.
Strengths:
Developer-Friendly Features:
Trade-offs to Consider:
Pricing: $12/month or $95/year.
Best for: Developers who want to adopt zero-based budgeting and don’t mind cloud storage.
YNAB has been around since 2004 and has a devoted following. It’s less about tracking spending and more about intentional money allocation. The methodology works, but the implementation has trade-offs.
Strengths:
Developer-Friendly Features:
Trade-offs to Consider:
Pricing: $14/month or $99/year.
Best for: Users who want something similar to Mint with better reliability and support.
Monarch Money was founded by former Mint employees who wanted to build what Mint should have become. It’s the most direct replacement for traditional Mint users who don’t have technical requirements.
Strengths:
Developer-Friendly Features:
Trade-offs to Consider:
Pricing: $15/month or $99/year.
After evaluating all these options, we built Budgie because none of them fully satisfied what we wanted as developers.
Open-source options required significant self-hosting expertise. Cloud services monetized user data or charged substantial monthly fees. Mobile experiences were often afterthoughts (PWAs instead of native apps). And privacy was always a compromise.
Budgie is native mobile-first, completely offline-capable, and radically private. Your data lives on your device in a SQLite database you can query directly. Bank sync, when used, employs zero-knowledge architecture. The app is open source so you can verify every claim we make.
Single-device focus means no automatic cloud sync between devices. We think this is the right trade-off for privacy, but we understand it’s not for everyone. If you need multi-device sync, Actual Budget with self-hosting might be better for you.
If you haven’t exported your Mint data yet, here’s what you need to know:
The Bad News: As of March 23, 2024, Mint is fully shut down. If you didn’t export before then, your historical data may be gone.
If You Migrated to Credit Karma: Your transaction history should have transferred, but it’s in Credit Karma’s format now. You can export from Credit Karma, but the data structure differs from Mint.
Mint’s export format was a CSV file with these columns:
Most Mint alternatives can import this format directly or with minor adjustments.
Budgie automatically attempts to match categories and can learn from your corrections to improve future categorization.
If you exported before March 23, 2024, you should have a CSV file containing your transaction history. If you migrated to Credit Karma, that data transferred to your new account. If you did neither, unfortunately, the data is likely unrecoverable. This is exactly why data ownership matters.
Credit Karma is a legitimate company owned by Intuit. However, their business model relies on monetizing your financial data through targeted product recommendations. If privacy is a priority, it’s not the best choice. If you just want free credit monitoring and don’t mind targeted ads, it works fine.
Budgie is designed as a mobile-first, offline application. There’s no server component to self-host because your data never leaves your device. This is intentional: it eliminates the complexity and security responsibility of running your own server while providing even stronger privacy guarantees.
For shared finances, Monarch Money has the best collaborative features. For privacy-conscious couples, each partner could use Budgie independently and share an exported summary periodically. Actual Budget with self-hosting can also work well for couples willing to manage their own server.
Budgie offers full offline functionality. Actual Budget works offline when self-hosted locally. Firefly III works offline on your local network. All cloud-based options (Lunch Money, YNAB, Monarch, Copilot) require internet connectivity for full functionality.
Most apps use Plaid, which requires sharing your bank credentials with a third party. Actual Budget uses SimpleFIN, which is somewhat more privacy-respecting. Budgie uses zero-knowledge sync where credentials are encrypted on your device and never visible to us. Firefly III typically relies on manual imports or community-built importers.
Budgie has a minimal learning curve with a familiar interface and quick setup. Actual Budget is moderate as envelope budgeting takes adjustment. Firefly III has a steep curve but is powerful and feature-rich. Lunch Money is low with a clean, intuitive interface. YNAB is moderate to steep as the methodology requires commitment. Monarch provides a low curve with a very Mint-like experience.
Budgie is and will remain free. The app is open source, and we’re committed to a sustainable model that doesn’t rely on monetizing user data or gating features behind paywalls. We may offer optional services in the future (like hosted backup), but the core app will always be free and fully functional.
Choosing a Mint replacement isn’t just about features. It’s about values. Ask yourself:
Mint’s shutdown was a reminder that free services have hidden costs. Your financial data is valuable, and companies will find ways to monetize it unless the app is designed from the ground up to make that impossible.
For developers, the path forward is clear: prioritize data ownership, choose open source when possible, and be skeptical of services that seem too good to be true.
Budgie exists because we wanted a financial app that treats users as customers, not products. One that works offline, respects privacy, and gives you complete control over your data. If that resonates with you, we’d love to have you try it.
Your money. Your data. Your control.
2025-02-03
Comprehensive comparison of privacy-focused YNAB alternatives. Detailed reviews of Budgie, Actual Budget, Firefly III, and more with migration guide.
Read article→2025-02-10
A technical deep-dive into Budgie's offline-first architecture, explaining how SQLite, AES-256 encryption, and device-to-device sync keep your financial data completely private.
Read article→Join the Budgie waitlist and be the first to experience truly private expense tracking.
Join Waitlist